different governance processes. The fragmentation of state government is not caused by the emergence of new governance; rather, it becomes a process adopted to deal with the diverse situation of government. This situation of discursive power and resources shared by numerous actors from the public and private sectors, governmental and societal, has pushed a new process of governance. This idea is therefore very different from that of Rhodes, who minimizes the role of government. Instead, it again highlights the importance of government in legitimizing different actors to ensure their accountability. I think this can be seen as the government empowering these actors to deal with lower level issues and increase efficiency, in order to take into account as much as possible the different interests of local populations and communities. communities. In Gerry Stocker's article there are five propositions of governance as a theory with critiques of each. First, he argued that governance refers to a complex set of institutions and actors from within government, but also beyond. This means that some government organizations and institutions have been abolished and operate independently. Power has shifted to intergovernmental and local actors. This also includes the participation of private sectors of society in governance. Therefore, I think that the debate in this perspective always remains that of the relations between different actors and the government, and the problem of this proposal is how actors can be legitimized in the process of government. The second idea is from the point of view of the responsibilities of different actors in the management of social and economic issues. And the boundaries between different actors in the exercise of their power and...... ideas on paper, such as changing governance traditions. Therefore, to understand political networks, one cannot ignore the social context and cultural influences of these actors. By introducing the concept of situated agent, decentralized theory assumes that everyone in networks is situated by context and depends on what they believe. Traditions are interpreted as the understanding that a person receives during socialization. This has a strong impact on the actions taken by individuals. From the perspective of government, traditions can be understood as the history of government. Institutions and organizations will therefore make decisions in accordance with these traditions. However, traditions are only effective at the beginning, but cannot determine the entire process. It is a theory that seems to treat networks more like human beings, which has a close relationship with social context..