Aristotle's readings were a bit confusing. I hope I got it. It resembles good because it is linked to happiness. The final good is achievable both completely and self-sufficiently. He continues by talking about human action. He tells readers that human beings and animals have completely different actions because a human action (omitted) is an action that is done on purpose and for a defined purpose, although technically animals also have these actions, but they do not use reason and intelligence. He later begins by discussing the formation of happiness. It shows us that happiness can be defined by human action or “function”. I didn't completely understand this part. What I think he understood is that the function of man must be like a conduct of life, which means that he has duties to take into account in that of the rational part of the man. I therefore believe that it creates happiness as the action of the rational part of man, which is the soul. To become a good man, one must perform his function well in the appropriate manner. To establish true happiness, this so-called action must be a practice. ...