blog




  • Essay / The Pros and Cons of Civil Disobedience - 1017

    Civil disobedience is the refusal to obey civil laws with the aim of bringing about a change in government policy or legislation, characterized by the use of passive resistance or other non-violent means. The use of nonviolence has been widespread throughout history, but the fusion of organized mass struggle and nonviolence is relatively new. The militant campaign for women's suffrage in Britain included a variety of non-violent tactics such as boycotts, non-cooperation, limited destruction of property, civil disobedience, mass marches and demonstrations. The Salvadoran people used nonviolence as a powerful and necessary element of their struggle. There is also a rich tradition of nonviolent protest in this country, including Harriet Tubman's Underground Railroad during the Civil War and Henry Thoreau's refusal to pay war taxes. Nonviolent civil disobedience was a key factor in gaining women's right to vote in the United States. it changed the face of the South. The Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) launched modern nonviolent action for civil rights. I also believe that the gay and lesbian community is the result of direct nonviolent activism and when ACT UP (AIDS Coalition to unleash Power) was formed, it focused not only on AIDS but also on increasing homophobia and attacks against lesbians and gays. We believe that government power is maintained through oppression and that respect for the tactics of the majority of the governed is often necessary to correct injustice. Our struggle is not easy and we must not consider non-violence as a sure way to fight oppression, the force of oppression. nonviolence comes from your willingness to take personal risks in Kohlberg's moral stage 5, moral rights and the social contract are explained in this political analysis on government power and antiapartheid work and in Central America when they led campus protests with hundreds of arrests and 130 removals from campus. Nonviolent civil disobedience took place at dozens of nuclear power plant test sites and military bases, in the 1970s there was mass civil disobedience from New Hampshire to California. In 1982, more than 1,750 people were arrested during UN missions to the five major nuclear power plants. The liberals of the time took these pieties to be self-evident: they declared that violence was equal and should be condemned in the same way; and that nonviolent civil disobedience is everywhere and is a more effective tactic for social and political justice. There are two hypocrisies to avoid. One is those who fetishize violence as a tactic of the oppressed, even when it is ineffective and unjust, so they demand people's support..