Philosophers of later times criticized Thomas Aquinas and considered his theory - "the absence of goodness is not a thing" as "casuistry". Since "the absence of something" is a thing, there is no doubt that the "absence of goodness" is a thing and exists because "goodness" exists, therefore "the absence of money" exists because that money exists. Conclusion: It is transparent to conclude a syllogism: 1): the absence of money is shameful. 2): money causes the absence of money. 3): money is shameful. Additional Consideration: Even though money causes so much unhappiness, someone may state that if we eliminated the existence of money, our life would be chaotic. However, humanity has never lived in an environment without money. It is therefore too difficult to determine people's living conditions by asking whether they have the concept of money. However, the company appears to be functioning well currently; it seems pointless to question the justification of the existence of