While only one really understood my theme, others came up with ideas I hadn't thought of. One of my peers who really didn't perceive my photos the same way I did was Frederick Babbitt. In his description, he said: “Bryce used a very complex variation to make me think and that's a good thing. The overall theme I developed while looking at his photos is that money is money and always has the same value no matter how someone obtains it. Yes, although money is money, it didn't come close to my theme. I could see how he got this, seeing that it showed the homeless which could represent poverty or how the money is there with drugs, guns and with a man arrested, to him it may -be marked, all the money is in different locations and since it doesn't matter where someone is, the money has the same monetary value whether it's in a bank or in an evidence bag at the scene of crime. While Fred was way off my theme, there was one person who just hit the nail on the head. The one who really understood my photo essay was Jonathon Amelang. I knew he understood my theme when he said, “The theme of the essay is that poverty can lead to a life of crime and drugs to make money. » His quote stood out to me mainly because he was the only one who received my essay. His quote showed me that someone else saw what I saw in the photos I have