In 2018, more than 100 children died in school shootings, and many more were injured. Guns have always been a part of our society, even when our Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution. Gun control has always been an issue, and now more than ever, it's being debated between two major groups. On one side we have the NRA and other pro-gun owners. On the other hand, there are liberal-leaning politicians and their voters. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay On February 20, 2018, another school shooting took place in Parkland, Florida, and now schools across the countries are demanding a radical change in gun restrictions. . But is it fair? The Florida shooting could have easily been avoided, whether it was the information the FBI received about the shooter's erratic mental state or the fact that four police officers waited outside the school listening to the unmistakable noise gunshots. Is it simply to take away the constitutional rights of the people because a few law enforcement officers made unforgivable mistakes that could have changed the fate of 17 schoolchildren? Many people, myself included, are torn between possible answers to this question. I agree that something needs to be done, but it shouldn't be as extreme as some are proposing. There are arguments and problems on both sides. Gun control activists are calling for a complete ban on automatic weapons. Many would say that the Second Amendment protects us from the government taking away our right to own a gun. However, what these people forget to mention is the first part of the amendment. It states that “a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” » The first part clearly says "A well-regulated militia." “We are way beyond that in our society today. There are people who own gun collections consisting of hundreds of weapons, ranging from tiny pistols to high-powered automatic rifles. Is this really necessary? Do people really need to own hundreds of guns, even in double-digit quantities? Many would say no, it's not necessary. Another argument is that a gun owner can hopefully prevent a shooting. However, people across the aisle say no, that a gun owner would either be too inexperienced or too scared to step in and prevent a mass shooting. They argue that the realistic chances of gun owners being able to protect themselves, let alone those around them, in an emergency are very slim. Some less radical politicians are calling for less scandalous solutions. These people recognize the right to own certain weapons, but demand restrictions on certain weapons, from banning high-powered weapons like Ar-15s, to increasing stockpiles that increase the weapons' rate of fire. The people opposite also have well-considered arguments. First, they bring up the constitution. Sure, he talks about “regulated militia,” but he also says, “The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” " This means that if Donald Trump woke up one morning and said, "I'm going to ban all guns," it would be voted unconstitutional because it goes against the Second Amendment. However, if he woke up one morning in.