Table of contentsIntroductionDefinitionsArguments and analysesConclusionIntroductionLeadership is mainly exercised by a single person (the leader), which for some people makes it unfair, due to differences in language, increase, etc. differences happen in a society or country, but what if that society was or is ruled by all or a group of people, it somehow raises people's hope that because it is led by a group, there is a greater chance that they will succeed. be heard and understood, they will have their representatives to express themselves even if there are differences of language, religion, etc. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay on the communications needed to lead a team, a company, or even a country. You have to understand each of the points proposed by people so that in the end, everyone agrees on something, this is what we call consensus. According to Merriam Webster, it is a general agreement, and this agreement is made or decided by a group of people, this is called democracy. When brought together, they are called consensus democracy, meaning the decision is made and accepted by most people. , their participation integrated them into society, into the country. In this article I will discuss and prove how consensus democracy reduces social inequality, but first let me define the words to become familiar with. Definitions According to Audiopedia (2017), democracy by consensus is an important feature of political culture to prevent domination. Democracy by consensus has really helped or could help a country or society gain everyone's approval. And as noted earlier, this increases the chances of citizen participation in decision-making. Having most people's approval on something because the person they support is part of that group who could voice their concerns creates unity on something. But there are disadvantages in consensus democracy because due to the fact that there are different people to run the country or society, it makes something difficult to decide. Decisions, solutions on something took longer than expected due to having a group of people to lead, too many brains and ideas is definitely a good thing, too many perspectives to consider is is somewhat what citizens want, but if it takes too long for a simple problem to solve because you have to do a lot of thinking which could then lead them to another problem, it's like watering the tree for the sake of it. extend or make many branches. According to the Genealogy of Consent (1970), democracy by consensus could be considered a “true democracy”, I quote “decisions are not taken by majority but rather after in-depth deliberations on decisions to which all consent”. the purpose of this statement is for the members of the group ruling the country or society to study the situation and decide whether what to do about the problem or issue or how they should handle this problem to be able to resolve it. According to Linder, W. (1970), “I think it is right that all languages, all regions and all political parties are represented in government”. Thanks to various people leading the country or society, it helped people to be calm and impartial when it came to the agreement because their concerns were heard and discussed by the group, regardless of their language or their region of origin, provided that they.