The theme of this essay is the theme of justice and revenge in William Shakespeare's Hamlet. The main question that arises would be: did Prince Hamlet do justice? The reason this question continues to arise as you continue to read it throughout the scenes is due to the word revenge. Let's take a look at the definition of what justice is, "the maintenance or administration of what is just, especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the awarding of deserved rewards or punishments." . If we looked at the play now, knowing what the definition is, we would have to say no. No form of justice has been served. Even though, by definition, it seems that justice was not served, in the end, justice came to those who were wronged. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Throughout the scenes in this play, it seems that the theme was to seek revenge and ensure justice for those who committed a dirty act. From the beginning of the scenes, Hamlet becomes furious when the Ghost comes to tell him the truth about how he died. Hamlet was absorbed by this information. He then wants nothing more than to retaliate against his uncle Claudius for the murder of the late king. Not only did he assassinate the late king, but he now also controls the kingdom. Which he believes should have been passed down from generation to generation, he also married his mother, which he considers to be an act of incest. Hamlet had to confirm that he had some sort of evidence to prove that his uncle had indeed killed the late king. As we continue to read the play, Hamlet is a man who thinks before he acts. It seems that until he finds the evidence, he won't kill his uncle and he goes so far as to put on a play to show his uncle that he knows the truth. At this very moment, his uncle runs out of the room. Does Hamlet have enough evidence for his actions? To me it doesn't show that he did it or not. Also, was the king afraid for his life that someone would attempt suicide instead based on the actions he witnessed in the room? This piece depicted individuals seeking revenge for someone who had been unjustly murdered. The prince attempts to kill his uncle, but it seems he has difficulty succeeding. Laertes thirsts for revenge for the murder of Polonius. He and Hamlet have a small argument at Ophelia's funeral, which ultimately results in a sword fight. Although both want retaliation, Fortinbras also wants to avenge his father's death by the late king and reclaim the lands that were originally his families, in doing so he will restore his family name. They are all very different in their meaning. of revenge and justice, Laertes wants to avenge his father and will do so whatever the cost and does not care if his actions are justifiable. Fortinbras will do what it takes to recover his lands lost by his late father; he is a man who makes vital use of current events. We can clearly understand that Hamlet is unlike either of them; it is only decisive at certain moments. This is shown through the scenes as he could not kill the king when he had the chance in the church as he wanted the king to confess to the murder so that it could be justifiable in his eyes. The last view pretty much sums it up. with the battle between the Prince and Laertes. They both want revenge, but they can't see past this pity fight and no one else can, it seems. They all want revenge and end up.