The notion suggests that once an individual (for the purposes of this literature review, we highlight the role of a police officer) commits an act deemed unethical, so he's about to do it. a downward slope which, over time, will guide them towards the execution of a more serious act (Kania, 2004). Kania further points out that once the gratification is accepted, it acts as a time bomb before the slope becomes too slippery for the agent to manipulate and he engages in more unethical acts. important and more serious (Kania, 2004). Del Pozo explains in his article about community policing that it is not necessary for police officers to be free. Some theorists argue that for there to be a healthy and trustworthy relationship between citizens and the community, small tokens of appreciation should be given, Del Pozo says this is not necessarily true. Although the destruction of goods and services has a long history in the structure of society, it is not essential for either side to maintain law and order. Ruiz and Bono highlight the central cause of the problems that gratification creates, a right that opens the way to the analysis of an individual's feelings about responsibility (Ruiz, Bono 2004). The authors argue that the cause of corruption can also be attributed to a similar fact. For any other position of authority, the ability to abuse that authority exists and must be