For this article, I have chosen section 11 of the Human Rights Code, entitled “Discrimination in Job Offers”. This section talks about not advertising a job that expresses a limitation or preference of any kind. This section is aimed at any individual in society and aims to “protect” them against any discrimination in the face of any job offer, specifying that any job offer must be free of any limitation so that everyone is “ welcome” to apply fairly. Unfortunately, this section has an unusual impact only on individuals who aim to be "protected", because although the law prohibits the use of language referring to limitation in advertising based on race, color, ancestry, place of origin, political beliefs, religion, etc. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get an original essayAdvertising is not the only step for employment, job advertisements sometimes contain subtle and discriminatory language that limits minority opportunities with examples such as "Must provide Canadian Driver's License" in an offer where driving is not an essential job function, this creates a declaration of exclusion on race, nationality, age and, in some cases, economy class. Another example I've seen is "Able to lift over 60 pounds." » in a retail job posting, when raising this is not one of the essential functions of the job offered, it creates another declaration of exclusion. With these two examples provided, I can say that people who consider themselves incapable of lifting more than 60 pounds or who are unable to provide a Canadian driver's license are only passing jobs, even without considering whether these specifications are mandatory for perform the essential functions of the job. In the case of licensing, when I've asked this question (is a driver's license essential to the essential job functions?), I've heard it all when it comes to answers like "what if I need ___(insert subject here) to be taken ____(insert location here)?". Naturally, if you're advertising for a truck driver, taxi driver, or something that requires running machines, then a license is an essential part of the job), but when you think about requiring a driver's license, you are inadvertently eliminating different groups of people from applying for your job because they can't get that driver's license (usually) through no fault of their own The author of the work order might say so everyone will know it's actually a legal ID, but if they don't say so. so people will not assume. People who are not able to obtain a Canadian driver's license will ignore the offer even if they are fully qualified to do the job. In the other example, stating in your offer that the ideal candidate must be able to lift more than 50 pounds creates an unconscious limitation in people with a disability or if they are naturally incapable of doing so when that is not part of the the essential function of a retail salesperson job posting, so there should be a change in the way the employment sector offers jobs "openly", but limiting the options to specific groups. On the other hand, ironically, this law protects the employment sector and its discrimination in its most subtle form, stating that they cannot advertise with limitations, but considering.