The contribution of the League of Nations to the development of international administrationIntroductionInternational administration has similarities with national administration, commonly called public administration. National administration is the study of the bureaucracy of government structure and organization, while international administration is also the study of organization, but unlike national administration, organizations are international and independent of the state. Their employees are considered civil servants and both share certain characteristics. For example, they are both educated bureaucrats who are hired on merit and have qualifications attesting to their level of education or training. They are both supposed to be neutral and they cannot publicly oust their affiliation with a political party or religious group. The international administration is made up of people from all over the world. All organizations want to attract and hire the best talent available, but it should be noted that there are certain factors relevant to international administration, such as government reserved positions, language qualifications and nationality. Most, if not all, international organizations aim to have all their member states represented on their staff, which often conflicts with the need to employ staff on merit. It is common knowledge that each country or region has its own culture or way of life and bringing together all these people from different cultures to work together as one team in case of conflict seems impossible as some employees may want to be loyal to their country even if they are international civil servants. For example, Iran and Israel have been enemies for many decades... middle of paper ... I should note that the league has had minor successes. After the league failed to prevent World War II, it was disbanded. The legacy of the League of Nations after its demise contributed immensely to the development of international through the points I mentioned above which provide a basis for international organizations and also provided experience after committing errors and also its property.Bibliography1. C. Gupta (1974), The League of Nations, New Delhi, Unikas2 editions. D. Hunter (1928), Drafting the Covenant, New York, Putman's3. F. Walter (1986), A History of the League of Nations, Westport, Greenwood press4. F. Morley (1932), The League of Nations, Washington DC, Brookong Institution5. W. Wilson (1918), Fourteen Point Address, US Department of State for International Information Programs