Disobedience occurs when the contrast between an individual's inner beliefs and the norms of society collide. However, it can be considered as an act of departure for an individual. The beginning of an action which has its alliance with Emerson's transcendentalism. Such transcendentalism in America gradually allows the separation of the individual from the community and forces man to think in a present and continuous context, which ultimately leads to the ability to choose, perhaps a Holy Grail to assume in one's life. life. it highlights how the pursuit of choice bestows authority upon oneself and brings an individual to a state of power.Say No to Plagiarism Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned” ?Get the original essayIn «. "Civil disobedience", for example, to the extent that such an individual distances himself from an unjust community that accepts slavery and, furthermore, the Mexican War, highlights the awareness of the tyranny of the majority . Indeed, for Thoreau, the dominant agenda coming from the majority, especially from an unjust government, was seen as swallowing up individual rights and liberation that ultimately led to individual conformity. In order to change this, his words provide a good and preferable room for maneuver that deviates from the existing thoughts of the time. Such an example would be: "It takes too long and a man's life will be gone." Please note that I have other matters to attend to. I came to this world, not primarily to make it a good place to live, but to live in it, whether it is good or bad. A man does not have to do everything, but something; and because he cannot do everything, there is no need for him to petition the governor or the legislature. . . its very Constitution is evil. » Thoreau's argumentative tone uses the personal pronoun "I". As the reading develops, "I" continually represents the importance and significance of Thoreau's (who is an individual) claim and thought. Such a personal pronoun then echoes its message in the meaning of an individual's voice and authority. Therefore, a serious act aimed at “making” the world a “good place to live” is condemned because it is an act of change in the external and community domain. This loses sight of the individual who simply wants to “live there.” Therefore, by uttering such words, it mobilizes each reader to the fact that they too have the important choice not to “do it all”, which seems to be fabricated by their unwanted majority. It offers a choice that a person can simply live by, whether it is “good or bad”. It is the starting point of an individualism that focuses on the scene of the personal domain and transmits to 19th century Americans a choice that they too could perceive. Furthermore, the communitarian “they” describes the electoral system of democracy. Thus, he criticizes the way in which social conformity, or perhaps the single system dictated by a majority, not only wastes the individual's time, but also leads to undesirable government improvement. This phrase also reflects a greater seriousness in a person's life than a communal act. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article now from our expert writers. Get a personalized essay. Thoreau concludes by emphasizing that “the Constitution is evil.” “Evil” is dramatic, somewhat subjective, but very effective in describing his dichotomous thoughts. The opposite of such "evil" means an active and "choice-sensitive" individual identity which sounds like an ideal of..