Iran's ability to start a nuclear war by obtaining nuclear weapons at the US embassy was violated and Americans were held hostage illegally under international law. These are just a few examples of what some Americans consider Iran to be. This article is informative and compelling on why we, the reader, should be convinced that Iran should get the bomb. Waltz explains that the crisis over Iran's nuclear program could lead to three possible outcomes. The first is that Iran would give up its nuclear products due to increased international sanctions and diplomacy. Second, Iran is developing a disruptive capability and testing one rapidly. The third is that Iran is openly testing its nuclear weapon. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Waltz explains how diplomacy and some sanctions can convince Iran to give up its nuclear weapons, but it is more than unlikely that this will be the case. Waltz also says that if you continue to add more sanctions, there will be even more pressure on them to make more nuclear weapons. I agree with this point: if you take into account North Korea, which has been sanctioned since the mid-1900s, it has always been able to build and test its nuclear weapons. North Korea has managed to build its weapons despite countless rounds of UN sanctions. The second point Waltz emphasized was his breaking ability. The term "breakout" refers to a situation in which a non-nuclear-weapon state party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the NPT, decides to build a nuclear weapon, thereby abandoning its obligations under the treaty. Iran would not be the first country to embark on a complicated nuclear program while building an actual bomb. Nor would they be the only country to break with the treaty. The main concern of the United States is militarization, so that it accepts a scenario in which Iran ceases to need a weapon of mass destruction. North Korea withdrew in 1985, but still managed to build and manufacture weapons. The Iranian nuclear program is clearly intended to develop a military nuclear capability. For eighteen years their weapons were kept secret, but it was not until 2002 that Iran's nuclear program was revealed. Third, the third is that Iran is openly testing nuclear weapons. If they did, it would be considered a power war and you know no one wants to get into a war with the United States. While every president from Nixon to Obama has accepted Israel's nuclear weapons, at some point the United States would prefer to see a Middle East completely free of weapons of mass destruction. The most difficult task is to uncover a “stealth” violation in which Iran uses its nuclear facilities. A stealthy escape could involve both declared and undeclared facilities. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, Waltz argues that we greatly overestimate the dangers posed by a nuclear Iran. . At this point, the United States is trying to prevent not an Iran that is actually armed with nuclear weapons, but an Iran that would theoretically be physically capable of building a nuclear weapon at some point. In my opinion, I don't think Iran should get the bomb in general. They remain an unstable country. The United States has-33521655.

Essay / Iran's ability to start a nuclear war by obtaining nuclear weapons at the US embassy was violated and Americans were held hostage illegally under international law. These are just a few examples of what some Americans consider Iran to be. This article is informative and compelling on why we, the reader, should be convinced that Iran should get the bomb. Waltz explains that the crisis over Iran's nuclear program could lead to three possible outcomes. The first is that Iran would give up its nuclear products due to increased international sanctions and diplomacy. Second, Iran is developing a disruptive capability and testing one rapidly. The third is that Iran is openly testing its nuclear weapon. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Waltz explains how diplomacy and some sanctions can convince Iran to give up its nuclear weapons, but it is more than unlikely that this will be the case. Waltz also says that if you continue to add more sanctions, there will be even more pressure on them to make more nuclear weapons. I agree with this point: if you take into account North Korea, which has been sanctioned since the mid-1900s, it has always been able to build and test its nuclear weapons. North Korea has managed to build its weapons despite countless rounds of UN sanctions. The second point Waltz emphasized was his breaking ability. The term "breakout" refers to a situation in which a non-nuclear-weapon state party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the NPT, decides to build a nuclear weapon, thereby abandoning its obligations under the treaty. Iran would not be the first country to embark on a complicated nuclear program while building an actual bomb. Nor would they be the only country to break with the treaty. The main concern of the United States is militarization, so that it accepts a scenario in which Iran ceases to need a weapon of mass destruction. North Korea withdrew in 1985, but still managed to build and manufacture weapons. The Iranian nuclear program is clearly intended to develop a military nuclear capability. For eighteen years their weapons were kept secret, but it was not until 2002 that Iran's nuclear program was revealed. Third, the third is that Iran is openly testing nuclear weapons. If they did, it would be considered a power war and you know no one wants to get into a war with the United States. While every president from Nixon to Obama has accepted Israel's nuclear weapons, at some point the United States would prefer to see a Middle East completely free of weapons of mass destruction. The most difficult task is to uncover a “stealth” violation in which Iran uses its nuclear facilities. A stealthy escape could involve both declared and undeclared facilities. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, Waltz argues that we greatly overestimate the dangers posed by a nuclear Iran. . At this point, the United States is trying to prevent not an Iran that is actually armed with nuclear weapons, but an Iran that would theoretically be physically capable of building a nuclear weapon at some point. In my opinion, I don't think Iran should get the bomb in general. They remain an unstable country. The United States has-33521655.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch