The notion behind loving someone is simply very complicated and esoteric in nature. People often describe a certain chemistry, like a certain attraction, necessary between two individuals in love, but Barbara Fredrickson is able to coordinate the definition of love based on chemicals. Barbara Fredrickson is able to provide the definition of love based on deductive reasoning based on chemistry, biology and neurology explained in Love 2.0: How Our Supreme Emotion Affects Everything We Feel, Think, Do and Become. As Barbara explains: “With each micro-moment of love, you climb another rung on the spiral ladder that lifts you to a higher level, to richer, more compassionate social relationships, to greater resilience. "Love can affect you so deeply that it reshapes you from the inside out and, in doing so, alters your destiny for future moments of love," says Fredrickson, but she seems to have forgotten that there are always two perspectives in any ideology. It is undoubted that love experiences play a crucial role in shaping an individual, but it is ignorant to say that only love will bring about such change. The reality is that not all relationships and encounters are. true "micro-moments of love" and these negative experiences also participate in what creates an individual's identity and thought process, knowing that an individual's cell plays a crucial role in the. decision of who to experience “micro-moments of love” such a negative experience will be associated with the factual and biological notion of love Thus leading individuals to feel that the negative experience they had to face was. the result of their body and its biology. The idea that their essentially unalterable bodies and brains were capable of causing them pain and sorrow will prevent them from realizing the love and desire for others described by Fredrickson. The idea that love operates according to the orders recorded by the individual's body makes love uncontrollable. Humans in nature are predisposed. Love has been inculcated as "sexual desire...or blood ties...a special bond and commitment" by society and dominant culture and new knowledge simply interrupts a well-established and accepted idea . The reality of the biological aspects gives the impression of an attachment of two minds or two bodies rather than an embodiment of love between two individuals. Experimental reasoning has not only stripped away the attractive but sentimental aspect of love. It is often said that when people fall in love, their heart knows it and they experience a special feeling and that is what most people try to find, the emotion of love. The biology of love seems to detach emotion from the individual by making love a matter of the brain rather than the heart. Furthermore, the notion of “love at first sight” loses all its meaning; as Fredrickson quotes from a collaborator, there must be "a true meeting of the minds - a single act, performed by two brains", in essence, the brains must mate for the connection to truly form and do so. love at first sight" is a thing of the past. The new vision requires an individual to