God being defined as the unknown and absolutely different highlights the lack of ability to understand Him. God is capable of making himself understood by man through various approaches. The first approach being that He could create unity through an ascension, where He would draw the learner higher towards Himself and enable him to forget his misunderstandings. God can also reveal himself to the learner, to whom the learner owes him everything because he now understands the truth which sets him free. However, both of these options are rejected on the grounds that they do not promote equality. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayFor God to be equal to man, God must ultimately come down and become a man himself. Indeed, He will appear “the equal of the humblest of men”, in the form of a servant. Yet another paradox is revealed when God appears as an individual who looks like everyone else. The problem arises: how can people understand God if they do not possess the ability? God being defined as the unknown, man realizes that he is incapable of understanding the existence of God. Thought is incapable of knowing the absolutely different, because in doing so it would invalidate it. The demonstration of proof of the existence of God is nullified because it is impossible. By calling God the unknown, it means that God exists subjectively. If an individual learns something about the unknown, then he will recognize that this unknown is absolutely different from himself. God is incapable of making himself understood because of his differences with man, because he has not committed sins, unlike man. Individuals were created different from God, but they made themselves absolutely different to the point of possessing no capacity to understand Him. Thanks to God, man is able to know that God is different from himself, but since he is unable to understand what is absolutely different, this raises the question: how could he understand what is absolutely different? There is obviously another paradox, because man needs God to know that he is absolutely different from God. This paradox “manifests itself as the absolute” (47). If an individual stops trying to prove the existence of the unknown, then God appears. If they let go, then there is a leap of faith present. God has become so different from individuals that they do not know him. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In fact, proving the existence of something is difficult without a prior hypothesis of its existence. While man wants to understand God, it is difficult for him because their absolute difference causes a rigid division between them. God uses many methods to try to prove His existence, including ascension and descent, and becoming the humblest of men, a servant. But God exists subjectively and cannot be understood by man because he has committed sins while God has not. God's efforts to reveal Himself to man fail because of man's inability to understand the unknown. Man, who ignores the existence of God, is incapable of carrying out an examination to prove his existence without presupposing his existence. A paradox appears: if man wants to understand what is absolutely different, then man must know that he is absolutely different from God, and he therefore needs God to understand this. Without God, we must take an act of faith by believing in his existence.