As a result of his investigation into this matter, if Toro decides to take legal action, he will most likely have a good case. Criminal law should be able to be implemented when an atrocity is committed in sports like football. Competitors should not be exempt from criminal law. Because this damage was done on the ball, it's harder to tell the difference between extreme challenges that happen seemingly out of the blue and a wild tackle. However, a case like this is best treated as negligence. On the other hand, Lupo has strong arguments to be able to challenge the decision handed down to him by the disciplinary commission, provided that he can demonstrate that it was an unfair trial. In addition, he risks losing his appeal due to the disproportionate nature of his sanction in relation to the seriousness of the damage caused. A good example of this was the case of Roy Keane in 2002, when he was fined £150,000 and given a five-match ban after deliberately injuring another player (BBC News, 2002). However, this is difficult to say, as not all the evidence is presented. For example, a big missing part is the referees' report, which is important because it will give more insight into the mentality of the players when tackling. This is why I gave this