The Replacement of HumansStatistics mention that the robot population has reached 8.6 million. Additionally, Statistics separates robots into two groups: industrial machines and service machines. It is humans who program and design robots. Scientists have the ability to make our lives easier through their inventions. Examples include cell phones, airplanes, and other great stocks. However, many inventories have unintended consequences, and one of them is the proliferation of robots invented to replace humans. The idea of ​​having these machines to perform human tasks and missions seems horrible. This article argues that humans cannot be replaced by robots for three main reasons. The first major reason is that robots have no heart, soul, or big personality. Using these machines will reduce the cost that the company pays to the workers as salary and will also save time. They don't take days off. Additionally, they will not get tired or sick from working long hours. Additionally, their work will be very precise and accurate. There will be no errors in their work. They can work in a hazardous work area without harmful side effects. For example, robots are used to wrap gifts in factories, in army bomb squads, and as bank tellers. All these jobs require high specific efficiency, available in robots. In the article “Eight Jobs Robots Do Better Than Humans” (Hill, C. and Watch, M., 2014), there is an example of robots working in the US bomb disposal team. Their work is better than that of humans, because with robots we do not put people's lives in danger. Additionally, the article states that many banking services use robots as tellers because it reduces financial expenses. Robots do the same work as humans, without pay. I also read an article titled “Deep-Sea Diving Robot Can Do Dangerous Work” by (Freeman, K., 2012). She mentions that it's a good thing that robots can replace people because we need robots to perform risky tasks such as deep diving. Robots are replacing humans in some applications, but there is no complete replacement because robots cannot be like humans. Robots don't have souls or unique feelings, so they don't have good reactions to things. Humans respond to things better than robots because they have souls and feelings. These machines can't do anything without the human brain, because people can think, solve problems, and create great things. Additionally, it is hopeless and impossible for robots to perform tasks that only humans can accomplish. We need to fight back because we don't need robots to take our jobs or accomplish our mission and tasks. And what will people be left with if robots take the place of humans? Experts say we need to encourage the adoption of new technologies, but I think we also need to think about the downsides of technology that could harm or damage our