Well, cooperative federalism's response to specific political challenges that have occurred in the past. Furthermore, the reigning conception of American federalism took place between 1954 and 1978. It was a political response to the political challenges of market failure. Social equity is its primary objective, cooperative federalism has considerably transformed American society. During the 1970s, conditions changed and the pressure for an expansion of national power inherent in cooperative federalism changed. Federalism also gave rise to coercive federalism, in which the federal government reduced its dependence. Additionally, state and local governments may not have sufficient constitutional provisions. This could be a political lever to change the system. Federal regulatory power in the 1970s and 1980s produced a more coercive system of federal preemption over state and local authorities. He also funded mandates to state and local governments. When it comes to challenges, it varies depending on the circumstances. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay The relationship between federalism and the study and practice of European integration is complex and composite. Cooperative federalism has therefore not been replaced by a new consensus on federalism. Over time, the system has evolved. One of the most important points of federalism is the distribution of power between the national government and the state governments. The protections our system has against tyrannical and uncontrollable government are one of the most important elements of why the system was designed the way it was. The federal government is also divided into three branches. It serves to ensure that all power is not centralized among a single person or group of people, as excessive power within a single group tends to corrupt. Our federalist form of government has several advantages, such as protecting us from tyranny. , disperse power, increase citizen participation and increase efficiency. It also has its drawbacks, such as the so-called protection of slavery and segregation, the increase in inequality between states, the blocking of national policies by states. Personally, I agree and support the system of federalism, agreeing with the advantages. I think our system is superior even to the parliamentary and ministerial system found in different places around the world. For example, like the United Kingdom and the confederation system found in Canada, as well as the one that precedes our current system. When the time comes, it's a race for time, there's a competition between states to lower taxes as much as possible and give businesses the most tax breaks. Competition can also be seen as a way to keep taxes low, just as free market competition helps keep prices low. Additionally, some states have more resources than others, which tends to increase fiscal costs, such as social and government programs. These programs tend to be higher in states where politicians have had more luck using excess tax revenue. We can see this again today as we watch states challenge health care reform laws passed by the federal government when we were under President Obama and the legislature once.