More often than not, humans must take care of each other in times of crisis. However, this role changes at the individual level where some feel that it should not be seen as a responsibility but as an act of will. This causes conflict between individuals and society. Society, on the other hand, considers things such as inequality, justice, and morality to be among the most critical aspects that humans should feel about, compared to the individual perspective when considering that This is a personal decision. Despite the many counterarguments that have been made against justice, morality, and equality, we must learn that each of them applies to every individual in the world, whether they believe in them or not. This makes everyone wonder if justice, morality and equality should be a way of life for every individual and every society? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Today's world is full of shouting and every person is shouting about poverty. Many people have been struck by the disaster, which calls for help from all corners of the world to defend humanity. Martha Nussbaum, in her writings, recognizes poverty as something that needs the attention of everyone in the world. She recognizes that many disciplines around the world have focused a lot on measuring poverty and how to end it (Martha, p99). She argues that the situation has enough weight to be recognized and studied in several other disciplines like philosophy that involve reasoning and critical thinking about the best path forward. Here, the capabilities approach paradigm comes into play to assess human development. Poverty is recognized as one of the commonly debated topics that tends to challenge social justice in the world. Given the gaps that exist between the rich and the poor, many governments have seemed to focus so much on national economic growth and neglect the reality of real people's lives (Martha, p. 99). With this, victims of social injustice have spread across the world, in areas such as East Bengal, due to the lack of basic necessities such as medical care, food and shelter ( Peter, p229). As if human life did not matter, many rich countries like the United Kingdom pumped large sums of money into infrastructure development while countries like China suffered from poverty. This suggests that these developed countries place more importance on their economic and infrastructural development than on the lives of the many refugees in camps who suffer from a lack of basic needs. (Pierre, p230). With so much in hand, the question of whether humans are truly fair to each other has continued to linger in the minds of many people and particularly in those of various philosophers and writers who have always tried to bridge the gap. gap between various ideas about how humans should behave toward each other by being just, morally upright, and how to inflict equality on all humans. The diversities that exist in human life must be studied and a common ground created to create the most conducive world for humans to live. The fundamental ideas of justice must be disseminated globally since the implementation of justice requires a broader perspective (Martha, p99). Justice and morality are always linked. ForTo be fair, there always needs to be a certain degree of morality. It would be wise for every human being to always prevent bad things from happening, because their occurrence would always affect other humans. It would therefore be unfair and immoral to watch others suffer because of problems we could have avoided. This requires us to prevent what is bad without necessarily promoting what is good and without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance (Peter, p231). However, it requires us to be self-reliant and live a life without depending on the help of others (Emerson and Ralph, p90). There is no limit to how far one should go in doing good things. It even calls on the government to change its policies to ensure that real people's lives are protected. The government's broader perspective of addressing the economic crisis and subjecting the value of life to numbers and tables is not the solution. Issues such as GDP need to be evaluated from a different perspective than human life. Rather, real stories of real people like Vasanti should be considered, which helps in assessing existing problems, thereby helping to find lasting and effective solutions to the problems (Martha, p100). Evaluating problems and finding solutions is a good way to explain moral justice. For example, the observers, experts, and supervisors sent to fight famine by famine relief organizations can establish a foundation upon which so many people affected by famine in all geographic regions of the world rely. It does not matter which party is affected by the disaster since the importance of human life is universally critical. It would therefore be immoral and unjust to discriminate against people on geographical grounds (Peter p232). However, there are theories that define people as a human resource, which is a strange antithesis to the capabilities approach. The capabilities approach is involved in comparative assessment of quality of life where fundamental social justices are theorized (Martha, p100). This assesses what each person in a society can do or be and the opportunities available to each person (Martha, p100). Most people on the planet have several opportunities and resources to improve the well-being of others around the world. For example, most people, rather than buying clothes to keep warm, tend to buy clothes to look good. The money that was used to purchase such clothes could be used to help other humans who are suffering in different parts of the world, such as refugees in Bengali. This can also be compared to an individual who is torn between jumping into a basket to save a drowning child simply because there are other people at the same distance as them and also because there is a risk that his clothes become muddy and wet on the ground. process. Saving a life in such a case is far more important than waiting for others to do so, as most of those present in such a case would be reluctant to do so. The element of reluctance makes the moral obligations of every human being questionable. Another opportunity available to each of us is to part with a few pieces that are different from what we have. These few dollars can then be used to provide for people who are suffering in other parts of the world without the ability to help themselves. As long as the organizations receiving these funds are not private, citizens and governments should consider it their responsibility to help.