Table of contentsIntroductionOverview of the filmRhetorical analysisSubject, setting and themesCharacterization and presentation of the charactersWhat the film wants us to knowConclusionIntroductionRhetorical analyzes in the arts and Literature is common practice and is part of the representation that the director gives of the environment in which the situations occur. Understanding the history of directors is essential to help us understand the context and content in which the majority of films are produced. The film offers a form of persuasion in the elaboration of social, economic and political situations aimed at creating mental reflection on the effectiveness of films in highlighting societal problems. The film Poverty, Politics, and Profits offers us the opportunity to review the economic and political aspects that underlie American housing projects. The film directly assesses the politics, profits and problems arising from the affordable housing system. In the reader's mind, we come to understand the themes that drive the affordable housing system. The characterization and framework used were applied to describe a narrative sequence that relies on the use of syllogism logic to help users understand the conditions, causes, and solutions to the affordable housing crisis. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayMovie OverviewThe film Poverty, Politics and Profit first hit the big screen in 1983 and continued to document the issues facing Americans and the world. community. The director, in this case, is more interested in the issues facing the American population, especially low-income people who make up the majority of the country's minority groups. The setting is based in the United States, where the author documents the plight of low-income people who cannot afford housing. It's no surprise that housing is a major policy and political issue in the United States, even when billions of dollars have been set aside to provide every American with affordable housing. The film takes an investigative approach to the affordable housing crisis with the question "how did we do the math?" being at the heart of the investigative documentary. The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LINTC) program is of considerable importance because it provides the backdrop for an assessment of how politics and business create a toxic environment for the poor.Rhetorical AnalysisTopic , context and themesRhetoric in the film industry is nothing new. and was used to dictate the use of setting, characterization, and incorporation of themes that advance the message. Rhetoric has also been used in various literary works, but there is a significant difference in how it is applied to cinema. Wildfeuer asserts that, unlike other literary devices, the film's rhetoric creates a container of meanings that allows audiences to "make conscious connections between what they decipher on screen and their experiences in the real world." It therefore becomes important to study the theoretical approach used and the textual clues incorporated in the film to understand its meaning and discover the intended meanings that affect society as a whole. The episode is an investigative piece that involves interview sessions conducted by correspondent Laura Sullivan with low-income people living in the United States. The director aims to understandwhy low-income people struggle to afford affordable housing, to document growing concerns about the affordable housing crisis. The topic of the survey is the affordable housing crisis among low-income people, leading to the topic of poverty and greed being considered serious problems in the United States. Symbolically, the setting is used as a representation of the situation in the affordable housing crisis, in which case the LINTC program has not achieved its goals. The correspondent, Laura Sullivan, focuses on a large city, Dallas, Texas, where low-income people live in deprived neighborhoods because they cannot afford adequate housing. The director's main goal is to introduce a figurative topic that represents a broader concept of homelessness and the affordable housing crisis in the United States. Significantly, this topic appears as an emblem that embodies issues of economic forces, class behavior, differences and exclusionary politics in the country. As an audience, we cannot help by identifying the subject of failed policies and the implementation of capitalist policies that have pushed many people into poverty. Since the setting takes place in Dallas, it is not surprising that the narration of the event by the director and his correspondent reflects, quite blatantly, the values ​​that shape the whole of American society. The director chose Dallas as the film's primary setting because it evokes and documents times and places that will help deepen the housing crisis even further. Suffice it to say that there are practical reasons to use Texas as a setting due to the large number of low-income Latino minority earners. It was important for the director to stick to this specific location to create the heart and soul of the narrative, and this eliminates any alienation that might have occurred from the American population towards the documentary. However, I can easily point out that the setting not only focuses on the physical details, but also documents the moral and psychological attitudes faced by all low-income people living in the United States. Characterization and how the characters are presented. Characterization in the film is crucial because it helps show the complexities and sophistication that underline the individual portraits. In this film, the director uses caricatured characters to dictate the multifaceted psychological thrust of the affordable housing crisis. In most cases, directors use flat characters, but this has changed due to the increasing demand for using complex and sophisticated characters. In the film, Constable is used to describe the situation in Dallas, and he takes the opportunity to be realistic about the issue of affordable housing. In fact, it creates imagery because it leaves the audience with a mental interpretation of the situation, even though there are short clips that show the dire situation. The use of complex characters also influences the imagery as the work is not seen as inferior but as an improvement on psychological novels by distinguishing between melodramatic and dramatic characterizations. In this case, the director introduced central and minor characters, of which the government is the main protagonist. At the same time, low-income earners are secondary characters in the political rhetoric that is the affordable housing crisis. Significantly, the director has a specific representation of the government and the citizens he serves, as they are both.