Prejudice is a pervasive and damaging societal problem that has the potential to influence decision-making processes in various contexts, including the criminal justice system. In the classic film "12 Angry Men," the character Juror 3 illustrates the destructive nature of prejudice and its impact on the deliberation of a murder case. This essay will explore the biases exhibited by Juror 3 and its implications for the decision-making process within the jury. By examining the character's behavior and attitudes, this essay aims to shed light on the harmful effects of bias in the justice system. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay The importance of this topic is particularly relevant in today's context, when discussions about prejudice, discrimination and injustice social have gained ground in public discourse. . Understanding how bias can manifest in the courtroom through the portrayal of Juror 3 is essential to identifying the need for reform and the importance of impartiality in legal proceedings. This essay will argue that Juror 3's biases significantly influence his judgment and threaten the integrity of the jury's decision-making process. Juror 3's Bias Juror 3's bias is evident in his unyielding belief in the defendant's guilt, despite the lack of substantial evidence. His personal biases and preconceptions about the defendant's background and behavior cloud his judgment and prevent him from objectively evaluating the case. For example, Juror 3's hostile attitude toward the defendant, whom he considers to be from a lower socioeconomic class, reflects his prejudices. His insistence on the guilt of the accused is rooted in his biased perceptions rather than factual evidence. This demonstrates how bias can lead to miscarriage of justice, as it distorts the interpretation of evidence and hinders fair deliberation. Additionally, Juror 3's personal experiences and unresolved emotional issues contribute to his biased position. Her strained relationship with her own son influences her perception of the accused, who reminds her of her ex-child. This emotional baggage fuels his prejudices and impacts his ability to consider the case objectively. Juror 3's unresolved anger and resentment toward his son is projected onto the defendant, leading him to make unfounded assumptions and prejudiced judgments. This highlights the interconnectedness of bias and personal bias, which can have detrimental effects on the legal process and the lives of those involved. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion The character of Juror 3 in “12 Angry Men” is a poignant example of the destructive nature of bias in the justice system. His biased opinions, rooted in personal experiences and preconceptions, significantly influence his judgment and undermine the integrity of the jury's decision-making process. The portrait of Juror 3 highlights the need for impartiality and the harmful impact of prejudice on legal proceedings. Moving forward, it is imperative to recognize and address the influence of bias in the courtroom to ensure fair and just outcomes for everyone involved. Further research and advocacy for reforms promoting impartiality and mitigating bias within the justice system are essential to solving this pressing problem..