Canada is a country known for being a multicultural country for many. While this is meant to be a positive thing in many minds, it also tends to be a negative thing. This is demonstrated in the essays “No Place Like Home” by Neil Bisondath and “Immigrants, Multiculralism, and Canadian Citizenship” by Will Kymlicka. Both essays forcefully explain why multiculturalism is negative, but also show the method the authors use to write, such as racism, how both authors use the method of pathos and logos, but also false premises. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essay In the essay “No Place like home” by Neil Bissondath argues that although multiculturalism has emphasized differences, it has also created a divide. Canada appears to have a record of racism, which shows continued separation in Quebec. It also includes sexism and various forms of discrimination linked to racism. Until today, people are discriminated against based on their physical appearance. As multiculturalism grows in Canada, racism becomes a problem for some. Bissondath goes on to say that while there are harms to multiculturalism, many Canadians must “seek acceptance of others, not mere tolerance of them” (Bissondath, page 307). What this quote means is that Canadians must learn to accept others rather than separate themselves because of a person's color, race or appearance. However, Will Kymlicka argues in his essay that the more multiculturalism the better. Kymlicka says immigrants stand together and are committed to protecting Canada. Immigrants also accept “the fundamental liberal-democratic values ​​and constitutional principles of Canada” (Kymlicka, page 312). In conclusion, Neil Bissondath argues that racism has created a problem in Canada by creating a divide, while Will Kymlicka argues that multiculturalism is good and better for Canada. Additionally, it is also important to highlight how Bissondath uses the Pathos method, while Kymlicka uses the Logo method. Bissondath uses more of an emotional appeal to get readers interested in the essay, while Kymlicka uses a rational appeal to get readers interested in her essay. Bissondath uses personal stories from his own childhood rather than using valid statistics/information like Kymlicka does. Bissondath goes on to recount how he had been alone in Toronto, but when he returned home to visit his parents in Trinidad, he realized how much things had changed for him. By reading this story, readers connect emotionally to what he is talking about and what his experience was like and continue to read his work, but also create an emotional response. While Kymalicka has data and statistics. “52% of Canadians disapproved of black-white marriages in 1968” (Kymlicka, page 313), reading that statisticians tend to have a broader view of what is actually true and what was happening at the time. era of multiculturalism throughout history. at that time. Using this method, Kymlicka persuades the audience using the facts available to him. Kymlicka also examines the ethnic and racial diversity of society. As can be seen above, Bissondath uses the Patho method while Kymalicka uses the Logo method..