-
Essay / Does an architect's ego get in the way of sensible design?
Does an architect's ego get in the way of sensible design? Isn't it? Does an architect have an ego? Well, what is the ego anyway? “Ego: a person's sense of self-worth or personal importance” (Oxford Dictionary). This is a very tame definition, most people will agree that the definition of ego is actually arrogance. a part of you that somehow makes you think you are superior or the less cynical among us would like to say that an ego is the autopilot of the mind, it is the thing that the we do as a conditioned reflex in response to any situation, it is biased towards childhood and professional experience, an ego can be flexible and adapt to its environment, or in many cases it does not This is not the case, which gives rise to the definition of a person's arrogant trait. Everyone has an ego, in different forms and intensities; it varies from person to person, depending on their experience, education and profession. An artist can have a bigger ego than a primary school teacher, artists must express themselves through their art, they spend their whole life and invest all their energy putting a part of themselves on a canvas , some would say it's purely self-indulgent. Teachers, for their part, must follow a set of rules that they are committed to respecting, in accordance with the national curriculum and timetables; they have very little time to express themselves, every once in a while you have a great teacher who manages to juggle the students and bring a personal touch to their teaching, but they are somehow a special breed. You often find that these breeds have very artistic and expressive hobbies. Before we get too deep into the ego of each profession, let's quickly and quickly move on to architecture. Do architects have egos? Are they letting middle of paper......s fail only on poetry and artistic work. However, I wonder if the focus was more on artistic appearance and representation rather than the spiritual function of the building, did the artists inside Zaha Hadid ignore this or did it prevented his form from seeing him. If she didn't see it, why didn't the designer, engineers and group of postgraduate "CAD monkeys" working for Zaha Hadid see this. The failure has been reversed since the building is now transformed into a transport museum, it can be argued that no new building had to be constructed for a museum, thus reducing costs, but that a brand new fire station has had to be built, which therefore does not mask its costs. There are exceptions; these being the designs that made sense and met the brief appropriately, even with egos.