Philosophy is a study that involves personal reflection and insight. Thus, the claim that philosophy is a science can be intensely debated even though the classification of any idea, subject or object is a matter of personal preference and opinion. Points like this influence my Philosophy Manifesto and the principles found therein. This short essay will provide as much information as possible about my personal beliefs and how they shape my overall view of philosophy in the scientific sense. At the end of this essay, my goal is to present someone else's personal philosophy so that they can see mine perspectives. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay First, my views on theism. I think I'm an agnostic because I believe in science and most of its logical explanations. However, I began to discover that science cannot explain all events and phenomena in life. Therefore, I can sometimes accept the religious explanation for certain things. Because I'm Chinese, I come from a background where most people believe in science or Buddhism. According to Adam Frank, Buddhism is one of the few religions in the world that generally finds agreement among scientists who study the emotions and the mind. So perhaps there is a reason why science and Buddhism coexist so well in my home country. Another thing that comes from my home country is the concept of Yin and Yang. Yin and yang is a concept of dualism in ancient Chinese philosophy and I learned about it when I was a child. For this reason, I agree with most of the concept, but it does not influence any of my personal decisions in life. The balance I see most in my own worldview is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Some may think that philosophy and religion are more similar than not, but the truth is that philosophy is much more critical and analytical than its faith-based counterpart. Philosophy always seems to answer “how?” with “why?” ", " Or ? » and “when?” ". Most often, religion answers “how?” quite perfectly, but no one seems to question the other facets of history or faith. In my life, I try to live in a way that suits me while following the laws and social moral codes that most people think are right. . When I think about how morality and free will intersect, I am often influenced and in agreement with the ideas that GWF Hegel was able to create. Hegel's theories and studies attempted to find the marriage between free will and the desires of a potential criminal and the morality that surrounded him and decided that his actions violated universal law and the desires of the majority of societies in which they lived. of this, my personal desires do not harm anyone, and I would never wish that. For this reason, my actions should never be considered wrong, because universal laws say not to harm others, because their personal being and livelihood is not my concern. My views on existentialism find me agreeing with Sartre in the sense that one can create one's own actions. meaning of life. I also agree with Camus because I don't live with a narrowly defined meaning to life and wondering about it all the time just seems absurd to me. Part of the reason I feel this way is that my views on Transcendentalism areessentially agree with Kant in that reality and perception are equally important. Indeed, “Kant argues that space and time are only formal features of how we perceive objects, not things in themselves that exist independently of us, nor properties or relationships between them ". So, reality is literally how we perceive it, and it plays on our perceptions to form our perspective. In the same way, few people realize that reality is something of their own construction, so their perceptions are often built around the influences of people, ideas and objects around them. For this reason, I agree with humanism and the idea of ​​not accepting dogma or superstition; As the American Humanist Association states, all humans can choose to be good people within their own realities without religious dogma telling them to do so. Nicholas F. Stang has a long article on Kant's transcendental idealism and how it explains the marriage between reality and perception. Thus, marriage can be seen as a truly egalitarian partnership rather than a patriarchal system where one concept dominates the other. However, Mary Troxel's work in the philosophical lineage of Arthur Schopenhauer and Kant shows that reality and perception can function in the same way while revealing legitimate things as being external to human consciousness. For example, Schopenhauer's view on aesthetics was that "the ability to consider nature aesthetically is the mark of genius and...describes the content of art through an examination of genius." After considering these points, I would say that the expression “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” is very true in that there will never be one standard of beauty. In this manifesto, the reason will be that human beings cannot fully grasp concepts like beauty because it is not part of our consciousness and capacity to do so. I am convinced that everyone can make their own destiny - even if they can. not able to control everything in their lives. However, with this lack of control, they can manipulate their desires and efforts to live towards the destiny they have designed for themselves once life finally decides to bend to them. Hugh Rice defines fatalism as “the view that we are powerless to do anything other than what we actually do” (Rice). Rice also writes that many people have a natural resignation to believing that life will give them what is intended for them. This is unfortunate, because the criminal should suffer no better fate than the priest and the hunter should suffer no worse fate than the poacher. However, fatalism dictates that whatever happens, will happen, and I can't seem to convince myself that this is how life should be or go. Quite simply, the key to all joy and happiness is to live as you love. I believe that this act, loving someone other than yourself, is the key to happiness. Unfortunately, human beings cannot fully do what they want when they decide to love someone else. Love requires trusting and allowing someone to build trust in you. With this, one must follow the rules created during the relationship. Sometimes I don't have a choice to do the things I want, so I often try to make the best of it. With this, Frontiers writes that a research article shows that Chinese students often associate free will with happiness. So I might possibly rethink my position. However, as I mentioned before, this should be..