An inspection of the vital concept in the Clash of Civilizations reveals several flaws and contradictions in Huntington's thesis. In Huntington's article, civilization is defined as "the highest cultural group of people and the broadest level of cultural identity that people have, short of that which distinguishes humans from other classes." Civilization has existed for decades. People were civilized. from the highest cultural groups to the lowest cultural groups. Moreover, civilization is determined by its fundamental and enduring values, its ways of thinking, its norms and its institutions. In this article, I therefore criticize Huntington's ideas on civilizations by highlighting some of his notions. the map and the paradigms, the euphoria and the harmony, the pure chaos and many more. Huntington's approach begins with his system which makes it difficult to categorize differently the issue of conflict which has dominated public discourse since its inception in 1993. The world cannot be one world, conflicts between countries continue even today countries are fighting for oil and oil, in this matter the world cannot be one, euphoria and harmony cannot flourish. because of the conflicts that cross the world. “The end of the Cold War meant the end of a significant conflict on the world political stage and the emergence of a relatively harmonious world. » The world cannot be harmonious in the sense that political leaders do not share the same views in the political environment, they differ in how they perceive their views and ideas globally, which leads to conflicts. The ideas of the world cannot end; the world can be boring without evil. The way Samuel Huntington cherishes his ideas, they can be proven wrong, because...... in the middle of the article...... in the context of the West and the East he asserts that their conflicts arise from the religion and civilizations of two countries. accumulated on them, and the continuing pattern of conflicts between the two civilizations increases. In conclusion, Huntington appears as a cultural thesis in the clash of civilizations, he then claims that the major distinction between people is that they are not political, economic and ideological. , they are cultural. If the distinction has primacy, it is accompanied by the conflicts of the world. Some of the facts he stated in his thesis are not proven, and the world cannot be one because even though wars are still happening today, countries are still fighting. This proves that Huntington's ideas are adequate because they can be criticized and proven wrong. The post-Cold War cannot be shaped by cultural factors alone; it can also be shaped by political factors.