No one should be searched without good reason and without a warrant. People should have the right to privacy – it’s important to them. It is ethical for police to obtain search warrants before searching a person's personal belongings. There have been conflicts in recent years over police powers. The police are disobeying the Fourth Amendment by conducting illegal searches. Critics disapprove of the police, while supporters agree with the police. Being searched without a permit is unconstitutional and police could take advantage of and abuse their power. American citizens then feel less safe. Citizens should have guaranteed rights as long as they behave. Neighborhoods don't benefit from this, because if the police take this power to enter a person's business without a license, then they will use their powers to see what kind of person it is, or to find s take care of people's personal affairs. In general, the police will not respect the privacy of the person and their property. Therefore, no one should be searched without an extremely valid reason and without a warrant. Unreasonable searches are unethical. Many people are involved in this issue. These include police forces, media, communities, adolescents and families, victims and families, and the justice system. Neighbors need to feel safe and controlled, and everyone needs to feel equal. “Liberty is freedom from arbitrariness or government” (http://dictionary.com/), and the Fourth Amendment guarantees that we have the freedom of privacy from the United States government. The Bill of Rights includes ten rights that cannot be taken away from people. The court case Board of Education V. Earls (12/26/01) deals with the 4th Amendment. Earl's is a student at a school that requires students to be in middle of paper... Citizens should be guaranteed their rights as long as they behave well. The 4th Amendment shows that every citizen has the right to privacy and that a search without a permit is illegal. Citizens of the United States of America should not be searched without sufficient evidence and a permit. Works Cited “The Oyez Project, Board of Education v. Earls, 536 US 822 (2002). OYEZ- United States Supreme Court Media. NP, 2002. Web. March 31, 2015. "United States V. Jeffers, 342 US 48 (1951)." FindLaw|Cases and codes. Np, 13, November 1951. Web. March 31 2015. .