As Americans, we have the freedom to be who we want to be and to live our dreams to our fullest potential. Our freedom manifests itself in many ways, such as speech, marriage, religion, sports and the lifestyles we have the right to enjoy, but most importantly, our health. The level of economic freedom varies between countries. Economic freedom is the main point in which Americans obtain greater opportunities in life, which explains why people have a better quality of life. It is one of the most important factors for the economic success of a country. Is the philosophy of healthcare about who deserves it or is it a basic right of all? It also includes the costs of treatments, medications and hospital stays. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay To begin the essay, every human being serves a certain purpose; whether they are right or wrong rests on one general point. For lay people, respect for these general points is considered a condition or an essential element for a decent life. What we consider to be an existence worth living rests on our thinking of our tendency and the states of its satisfaction. These are the qualities and values ​​by which we live. This event may be related to external factors such as health/well-being, material success, and economic well-being. The United States is the primary country to have recently experienced such a continuing loss of economic freedom, and the reasons are clear. Dramatic changes in the size and scope of government under the Obama administration, including through new regulations in areas such as health care and finance, have hit the economy, influencing nearly every Americans here, reducing openings for generation and non-administrative businesses. The growth of government was accompanied by growing cronyism that undermined the norms of law and the sense of reasonableness. Economic freedom is based on the principle that there is a strong positive relationship between financial opportunity and normal real income per capita and freedom. The American opportunity is incredible. Nowhere else has the freedom of normal residents been more important, progressively secure and increasingly assured. Admirers of our liberty and opportunity have respected every aspect of it, from our security of religion, the liberty of our free races, from our right to speak freely to our impartial legal framework to our ability to choose our own private affiliations and those of heaven. the limit from there. One of the most compelling aspects of our freedom is obviously America's high level of economic opportunity and the resulting wealth attainment. The American view is the right to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness. . We weren't born with the right to take a trip to Orlando or eat at Cheesecake. We have specific rights. Health care in today's society is scientific, complex and a service; So, can anyone be born with a right to this? In the American framework, you reserve an option for health care if you are fortunate enough to be able to pay for it or if you can earn it through your own activity and effort. Some people cannot handle the cost of medical care in the United States. Either way, they are basically a small minority in a free or even free nation.semi-nation. The fundamental unpredictability of Plato's Forms Hypothesis, as first connected in the Phaedo, is barely perceptible, because the Phaedo first proposes that memory is close to the mastery of ideas – l he idea of ​​a “certain equity in size”, for example, is sparked by the vision of sticks and stones appearing roughly equivalent (74a-e). Not only that, but the equivalent is recommended by the recapitulation through which Socrates initially presents the Forms, 65d-e: "Shall we say that there is such an incredible marvel as the Just himself? or not? Furthermore, Beauty and Good? I think this speaks for health and strength, and in a word for the truth of everything else, which they both fundamentally are. Such a memory plot leaves much to be desired. Plato also considers the way in which learning of their temperament cannot be obtained through sensory sense alone as satisfactory proof of the presence of different structures, as he shows by virtue of proportionate-looking sticks and stones. It is said that health care is promised in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence states that "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness". In what profession today would health care not be provided as part of life and the pursuit of happiness? I have loved ones who, thanks to early detection of their cancer or medication, are quickly living long and extraordinary lives. Without health care and insurance, their lives would have ended prematurely. If healthcare is only for the rich and powerful, we must not be equal. But if the poor and ordinary men are to be denied medical services (health care), then they are denied their rights to life and happiness. So, does every American have decent quality health care as a fundamental right and not a privilege? It is not difficult to understand the sincere enthusiasm with which so many individuals approach the issue of the health care system. It would take an incredibly cold heart to not care about the urgency of people who need help but can't handle the cost. Regardless, rights do not arise from energy or need. Needing something does not qualify you for it - not in the case that another person has to give or produce that thing. The rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are negative rights because they guarantee our self-sufficiency, allowing us to live smoothly and pursue satisfaction and happiness, without forcing others or being forced by them. The possible future of this imaginative and logical country, the United States, lies in our inability, thus far, to respond sufficiently to the breaches of protection that innovation brings us. It's not just the NSA and its breaches, nor the many trackers, signals, and revelation engines that control our means through the Internet to make money, nor the miscreants with their malware, nor our own lack of judgment in archiving every thing we do. on Facebook. These are all parts of a huge problem. Innovation has empowered us, and given us valid justifications, to devote more and more time to our lives in the computerized world, such as friendships, medical care, bank statements, telephone calls, location information, on the web. Moreover, little by little, the private and particular well of ourvitality and our capacity for innovation is starting to dry up. In today's society, the government oversees almost every aspect of our lives, and it seems like there is a law in place for everything that controls what we do as Americans. This is not true for everyone, as there are truly extroverted individuals and child prodigies who thrive without protection. Most Americans are cautious and need to conciliate others. This is beyond the realm of imagination. American freedom and opportunity are limited by their resilience to everything. From bathroom laws to abortion to free health care for all, the costs of each case are wasted. America focuses on the present rather than the long term, looking at normal American debts. Another risk is that of the government; I believe one of the greatest dangers to American freedom and opportunity is government. In Exercise 24, we discovered two dangers to our freedom and opportunity: moral relativism and weak despotism. These two ideas ran the government and, in the long run, led to lost opportunities. In moral relativism, the legislature slides toward tyranny, resulting in a loss of opportunity. In soft despotism, the general population voluntarily approaches the legislature for satisfaction, which ultimately results in a lost opportunity. I think today, as Americans, we will accidentally soften despotism. The U.S. government has become progressively more entrenched since its inception and has been granted more power over the general population than its originators hoped. For example, many administrative professions that are controlled by the government are often unaware of their jurisdiction. The government should provide and protect its people, but in previous years it has neglected to address the problems of the general population who need additional protection. In recent years, numerous shootings and violent acts have occurred across the United States. The government's waste in passing laws to ameliorate these problems has made it an incredible risk to our freedom. The Constitution and Bill of Rights were developed to protect the general population and their rights from the government. I think the legislature has done more harm than great and is perhaps looking to the Constitution and Bill of Rights in case someone has damaged them. Instead, they should use the records to improve the way our administration is controlled by uncovering weaknesses. The government should just focus more on satisfying the desires of the general population. Rousseau's theory believed that health care made the problem very clear: pitting the free market against socialized medicine that did not help Americans understand. At its most fundamental, the debate over health services is about how to make care progressively equitable by making it open and reasonable for more individuals, for example by requiring individuals to purchase protection, while preserving individual opportunities and decisions. Balance and opportunity are under strain in health care as in many other areas of agreement, e.g. welfare, the lowest wage allowed by law, social security, control of firearms, the right to free speech and issues of religion. to the rationing of medical care? Evans says this will be the case and that Americans should look for the phrases “'.