The SelfAs we have learned in previous weeks, there are two views of the self. The avocado view and the artichoke view. As we all know, an avocado is a pear-shaped fruit with a rough, leathery skin, edible, oily, smooth flesh, and a large pit. It is also defined as the evergreen tropical tree that bears the avocado. It is native to Central America and widely cultivated elsewhere. Now that we understand how an avocado is made, what about an artichoke? An artichoke is a large, thistle-like composite plant, cynara scolymus, native to the Mediterranean region, whose numerous scales like braes and immature flower head receptacle are eaten as a vegetable. How can these two plants be an idea of ​​self? Did you know that if one avocado seed is planted, a whole new avocado plant can grow? And once the plant is fully grown, it has the ability to produce a whole new generation of avocados. Some philosophers argue that humans have an essential nature. But what does that have to do with a lawyer? In an avocado, the seed is the center that contains all the essential information about what makes an avocado a lawyer. As in humans, the essential part of humans, the part that makes us more human than animal is the avocado seed. The essential nature of man is to believe that it is God. But how do we determine whether humans have an essential nature? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay Well, it’s quite simple. Since we know that the essential nature is God and reason, how are we all connected through God? If you believe in God or read the Bible, there is a verse that says “Let us make man in our image.” We are all in the image of God the Father and God the Mother. And how are we all connected through reason. Well, in this topic we have critical thinking and Socrates. Socrates asked what was the purpose of life? Many people have an answer to this question and they are all different. But humans all have the mind of a kitten, what I mean by that is that we are always looking for answers somewhere. But what is the idea of ​​self in artichoke? Well, some philosophers disagree that humans have an essential nature. An artichoke has a spring layer that can be peeled off one by one. And when the last layer is gone, there's nothing left? Why then? Well, that's because the "heart" of the artichoke is actually the base of the flower. The heart, however, does not contain the essence of the artichoke. In short, the artichoke is just a bunch of layers. No part of an artichoke can produce another generation of artichokes. The artichoke vision says that we are capable of rational deduction and communication. But it also means that people do not share the same fundamental logic. According to the artichoke view, we are determined by our actions and not by God or the universe. According to the artichoke view, our engagement with our environment makes us who we are. What is the connection between the artichoke's point of view and that of the lawyer? Well, I know how different they are. As stated previously, with the avocado view there is a core or essence that does not change after peeling the outer skin. This inner essence is not changed by life's experiences, no matter how great or traumatic. This is because it is believed to be what defines human nature. This inner essence is considered the soul. Then, theArtichoke's point of view says that humans have no core, no essential nature and that our actions and experiences define who we are. However, thanks to the power given to humans, we can take charge of the situation and develop a character that does not change despite life's challenges. This is what gives the artichoke at least some similarity to the avocado. Art and Philosophy So, now that we've discussed the artichoke and avocado view, what is art? What relationship does art have to philosophy? How does this help discern what is true and what is not? And that captures the avocado/modern idea that we have an essential, shared human nature and that the self and the world are separate entities? Philosophers have approached the subject of what is considered beautiful or artistic aesthetics in the same way that they have approached morality. Some have attempted to define the properties of beauty and art, while others have suggested that appreciation of these qualities depends on culture or is simply a matter of taste. Socrates once asked “what is beauty?” » Do you think he was looking for the real definition? No, he was trying to see if there is a specific property that makes something beautiful. Is there something that makes all things beautiful? This is the question he really asked himself. Plato held that there is an ideal beauty, which exists in an ideal world of perfect forms. But some philosophers say we define beauty based on our experiences and cultures. So why do people have very different views on beauty? Some people think that beauty is not an inherent quality of things; rather, it is “in the eye of the beholder.” This means that beauty is a matter of opinion. So once again, what is the connection between art and the lawyer’s vision? Well, the lawyer's view says that we all have an essential nature. In the previous paragraphs, I just said that Plato held that there is an ideal beauty, which exists in an ideal world. This means that we would all have the same thoughts about art and beauty. But what does this have to do with seeing the artichoke? The artichoke view says that we are determined by our actions and experiences. Some philosophers believe that we define beauty based on our experiences and cultures. So why do people have very different views on beauty? Some believe that beauty is not an inherent quality of things; rather, it is “in the eye of the beholder.” This means that beauty is a matter of opinion. Sounds like the lawyer's view of self, doesn't it? The final question in this section of the article is therefore: Who captures the avocado/modern idea that we have an essential, shared human nature and that the self and the world are distinct entities? I believe that no one in particular was able to grasp the lawyer's point of view. From what I understand, Kant and Schelling definitely supported the artichoke view. But I neglected or discredited the lawyer's point of view, based solely on my opinion. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Truth and Reality What is Truth? here are four truths in philosophy. But what is truth? Well, empiricists believe that truth has what is called an empirical guarantee, which is consistent with the correspondence theory of truth and is based on the assumption that there is an objectively present world of facts that exists au- beyond our perception. Basically, they believe that there is a statement or believe that it.