Table of ContentsOrigins and Evolution of the Clash of Civilizations DebateImplications for International RelationsRelevance in the Contemporary WorldConclusionThe “Clash of Civilizations” Debate, Introduced by Samuel P. Huntington in 1993, remains an important and controversial theory in the field of international relations. This essay will provide a comprehensive exploration of the origins and evolution of the clash of civilizations debate, analyze its profound implications for international relations, and assess its continuing relevance in the contemporary world. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayOrigins and evolution of the clash of civilizations debateThe origins of the clash of civilizations theory can be traced to the radical change in the global landscape following the end of the Cold War. Samuel P. Huntington, a prominent political scientist, argued that the world was entering a new era where conflicts would no longer revolve around ideological clashes, as was the case during the Cold War. Instead, Huntington asserted that cultural and civilizational differences would become the defining fault lines in world politics. Huntington identified seven major civilizations: Western, Islamic, Confucian, Hindu, Slavic-Orthodox, Latin American, and African. He argued that these civilizations would increasingly come into conflict as they interacted on the global stage. His thesis posited that the world was not converging toward a single, unified culture, but was in fact fragmenting along civilizational lines. Since its publication, Huntington's theory has sparked intense debate and criticism. Some scholars have accused it of oversimplifying complex global dynamics, neglecting the role of non-state actors, and essentializing cultures. Critics have also argued that the clash of civilizations framework risks perpetuating stereotypes and prejudices. However, despite the controversy, the theory has had a lasting impact on the field of international relations and influenced the policies and strategies of governments and institutions. Implications for International Relations The theory of the clash of civilizations has had profound implications for international relations. It challenges the prevailing belief that the end of the Cold War would usher in an era of global cooperation and convergence. Instead, he suggested that cultural and civilizational differences would become the main drivers of international conflict. This perspective has significantly influenced the foreign policy of several countries. For example, the United States' approach to the Islamic world after the September 11 attacks can be seen as partially rooted in the theory of the clash of civilizations. The notion of the “war on terror” presented the conflict as a clash of Western values ​​against perceived Islamic extremism, reflecting the clash of civilizations paradigm. Additionally, the clash of civilizations debate has led to discussions about the role of identity and religion in international relations. . This raises questions about the compatibility of different value systems and whether cultural diversity can coexist peacefully on a global scale. These discussions have informed diplomatic strategies and negotiations in an increasingly interconnected world. Furthermore, the theory has prompted a reassessment of the role of culture and identity in the formation of alliances and conflicts. He emphasized..