As this was the second course, I had become more open-minded to the course after being persuaded to do my best, despite my lack of experience in the field of study and my inability to see its relevance for my pursuit of law studies. My attention was caught from the start by a summary of the nature of science and technology. This solidified my understanding of science as being understanding-oriented and dealing with the natural world and technology as an application-based concept related to the human-made world. This greatly helped in clarifying doubts after the first class. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get an original essayA feeling of great interest overwhelmed me when the exercise “What do you see” appeared on the screen, I I started to question myself after being able to see several different scenarios in the same image. This raised the question of the difference between observation and perception. This allowed me to understand why humans see not only with their eyes but also with what they have in their minds. This surprised me because it opened my eyes to a new perspective. In future studies, I will have to be careful about how I perceive and judge certain aspects. The lecture then described and explained the different scientific methods used by scientists, the inductive approach, the deductive approach and the hypothetico-deductive approach. I clearly understood that inductive reasoning uses a premise or fact to create broader theories based on generalizations without having tested the theory. I have been careful to note that this theory can be refuted by a single exception to the law, which refutes it. From my understanding, inductive reasoning is a useful tool for creating scientific theories with little or no experimentation. However, this can be controversial on certain aspects where the law does not apply. Deductive reasoning has also been described as a type of valid reasoning that begins with a premise with the goal of discovering new information or proving a theory. It was said to be considered the “standard” approach because it involved a testable hypothesis and experimentation. Through the use of examples, I clearly understood how deductive reasoning is used to discover new “ironclad” facts. It occurred to me that deductive reasoning is used daily by everyone without any knowledge. As such, for future reference, I plan to use it more frequently to make informed decisions as it is a useful tool. I also noted that we should not condemn inductive reasoning because both techniques are useful in certain circumstances. I agreed that hypothetico-deductive reasoning is the ideal research method because it involves the use of hypothesis testing through a series of equally important steps to determine whether the hypothesis is true. I have observed that this involves the most experimentation and research to find an answer as to whether the identified hypothesis is correct or not. This method, I believe, is the most important and best method to use. However, it was repeated that the other two methods should not be condemned. I must analyze the problem and the hypothesis to be solved to determine the most appropriate method to use. In lesson three, we continued our study of scientific methods and the nature of science. First, a brief review of the research methods described in the second course was carried out. That.